<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Open Bar Database</title>
    <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>scarter@valkyrielaw.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-07-26T15:26:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.valkyrielaw.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Who Needs to Know?</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/who_needs_to_know/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/who_needs_to_know/</guid>
      <description>Managers and human resources departments must be careful about what they communicate to others in the organization about employment termination.  A recent case highlights the need for caution.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-07-26T14:26:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Deeply Committed?</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/deeply_committed/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/deeply_committed/</guid>
      <description>The B.C. Court of Appeal recently reviewed the legality of a development permit, and opined on whether the owner may have established a non&#45;conforming use.  Read the case review for comments on the possible implications of a development permit requirement on an owner&#39;s ability to establish an irrevocable commitment to use.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-07-07T20:55:11+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Don&#8217;t Jump the Gun: AWOL Employees</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/dont_jump_the_gun_awol_employees/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/dont_jump_the_gun_awol_employees/</guid>
      <description>A recent case is a reminder to employers not to assume that an absent employee has quit.  Read more to learn how to deal with AWOL employees.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-06-30T10:33:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Small Omissions, Large Liability</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/small_omissions_large_liability/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/small_omissions_large_liability/</guid>
      <description>The Court of Appeal recently upheld the allocation of liability to a municipality for an accident which caused serious injury.  The case highlights the importance of preventive measures to protect the public.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-06-24T13:13:10+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Workplace Policies: An Ounce of Prevention</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/workplace_policies_an_ounce_of_prevention/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/workplace_policies_an_ounce_of_prevention/</guid>
      <description>A recent decision highlights the limits to accommodation an employer may be required to make in respect of absenteeism on the grounds of physical disability.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T19:36:12+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>No Warrant, No Entry</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/no_warrant_no_entry/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/no_warrant_no_entry/</guid>
      <description>The B.C. Court of Appeal has ruled as unconstitutional a provision of the Safety Standards Act, which provides for entry without a warrant to inspect for electrical safety risks that may be related to marijuana grow operations.  Local governments may wish to review their practices.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-05-21T14:00:55+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Bill 11 &#45; Planning Law Amendments</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/bill_11_-_planning_law_amendments/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/bill_11_-_planning_law_amendments/</guid>
      <description>Bill 11, which has received third reading, will introduce some amendments to planning law issues for local governments.  Read on to see how this may affect your local government.</description>
      <dc:subject>Legislative Updates</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-05-17T19:26:41+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Manners on the Picket Line</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/manners_on_the_picket_line/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/manners_on_the_picket_line/</guid>
      <description>The court has recently clarified that some conduct on picket lines will not be tolerated.  Reasonable and respectful behaviour will be expected from union and management, although the parties may disagree on other matters.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-05-17T03:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Deference to Local Government Decisions</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/deference_to_local_government_decisions/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/deference_to_local_government_decisions/</guid>
      <description>A recent Court of Appeal decision, involving a challenge to a taxation bylaw, has re&#45;affirmed that courts will often defer to the decisions of municipal councils and regional district boards.</description>
      <dc:subject>Case Reviews</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-04-26T14:38:11+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Winds are Changing</title>
      <link>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/the_winds_are_changing/</link>
      <guid>http://www.valkyrielaw.com/the_law/openbar/the_winds_are_changing/</guid>
      <description>On July 1, 2010 new rules will apply to litigation in British Columbia.  We provide a brief overview of the key amendments.</description>
      <dc:subject>Need to Know</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2010-04-25T11:11:51+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>